Welcome to the “30 Issues” page, where we analyze the decline of BearingPoint Inc., one of the most renowned professional services organizations. This chapter of the book carefully and thoughtfully unpacks, explains and prioritizes the 30 issues the author believes directly led to the ultimate demise of BearingPoint Incorporated.
30 Issues
Decline Analysis of BearingPoint Inc.
Decline Analysis
This section provides a comprehensive overview of the decline analysis, detailing the critical issues that led to BearingPoint’s protracted decline following its celebrated IPO. The analysis categorizes each issue to highlight its impact:
Catastrophic (C)
- 1. The Structure of the Initial Public Offering (IPO) – KPMG LLP and Cisco Got all the Money
- 2. Greed, Egos, Arrogance and Ignorance
- 3. Lack of Proper Oversight from our Board of Directors
- 4. Executive Leadership had No Experience Leading a Publicly Traded Company
- 5. Not Prepared to be a Public Company
- 6. Arthur Anderson and Arthur Anderson Business Consulting
- 7. Sarbanes Oxley (SOX)
- 8. Business Model Post IPO – Partnership vs. Corporation
- 9. Too Much Employee Ownership
- 10. Not Securing a UK Practice of KPMG
- 11. Global Expansion and Acquisitions
- 12. OneGlobe Financial System Implementation – One Globe
- 13. Approach to Restating Financial Reports
Significant (S)
- 14. The Business Environment Changed and We Did Not
- 15. Timing and Economic Downturns
- 16. Debt
- 17. The Cisco 4000 Initiative
- 18. Unrealistic Expectations
- 19. Internal Politics, Corporate Culture and Employee Morale
- 20. Lack of Recurring Revenue
- 21. We Were Unable to Grow the Business
- 22. There was Never Wide-Spread Interest to Own our Stock
Interesting (I)
- 23. Poor Investment Decisions – “Go Big or Go Home”
- 24. Restructuring Charges
- 25. Legal Over-Reach
- 26. Fraud, Corruption and Unethical Behaviour
- 27. Litigation
- 28. Poor Delivery and Write-Offs
Foundational (F)
- 29. Attrition – Voluntary Turnover
- 30. Auditors
Event Categorization
Issues are prioritized based on their overall impact. Addressing the higher-priority issues might have mitigated some downstream problems or reduced their severity. This abridged overview summarizes key events and their consequences.
This categorization helps to understand how these issues contributed to the company’s decline over eight years from the IPO in February 2001.
- Catastrophic (C): Issues directly connected to the demise.
- Significant (S): Issues that had an impact but were manageable.
- Interesting (I): Unique to BearingPoint but with less impact.
- Foundational (F): Common to all organizations.
Issue Priority | Impact | Description |
---|---|---|
1 | C | The Structure of the Initial Public Offering (IPO) – KPMG and Cisco Got all the Money |
2 | C | Greed, Egos, Arrogance, and Ignorance |
3 | C | Lack of Proper Oversight from our Board of Directors |
4 | C | Executive Leadership had No Experience Leading a Publicly Traded Company |
5 | C | Not Prepared to be a Public Company |
6 | C | Arthur Andersen and Arthur Andersen Business Consulting |
7 | C | Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) |
8 | C | Business Model Post IPO (Partnership vs. Corporation) |
9 | C | Too Much Ownership |
10 | C | Not Securing the UK Consulting Practice of KPMG |
11 | C | Global Expansion and Acquisitions |
12 | C | OneGlobe Financial System Implementation |
13 | C | Approach to Restating Financial Reports |
14 | C | The Business Environment Changed and We Did Not |
15 | S | Timing and Economic Downturns |
16 | S | Debt |
17 | S | The Cisco 4000 Initiative |
18 | S | Unrealistic Expectations |
19 | S | Internal Politics, Corporate Culture and Employee Morale |
20 | S | Lack of Recurring Revenue |
21 | S | We Were Unable to Grow the Business |
22 | S | There Was Never Widespread Interest to Own Our Stock |
23 | I | Poor Investment Decisions – “Go Big or Go Home” |
24 | I | Restructuring Charges |
25 | I | Legal Over-Reach |
26 | I | Fraud, Corruption and Unethical Behavior |
27 | I | Litigation |
28 | I | Poor Delivery and Write-Offs |
29 | F | Attrition – Voluntary Turnover |
30 | F | Auditors |
For a more in-depth decline analysis and detailed examination of each issue, refer to the full content of our book.